Nov 1st, 2021 50 Games Tested: GeForce RTX 3080 vs.Looking for the best Minecraft texture packs for the Java Edition? Minecraft’s low-fi charms were predictably the first thing modders took to ‘fixing’.Nov 1st, 2021 Gigabyte M32U Review - Finally a Reasonably Priced 4K Gaming Monitor.Oct 27th, 2021 Intel Core 12th Gen Alder Lake Preview.DDR5 on Intel Core i9-12900K Alder Lake Review Nov 4th, 2021 Intel Core i5-12600K Review - Winning Price/Performance.Nov 4th, 2021 Intel Core i7-12700K Review - Almost as Fast as the i9-12900K.Nov 4th, 2021 Intel Core i9-12900K Review - Fighting for the Performance Crown.Posted on Apr 15th 2007, 12:26 Reply #24 Completely Bonkers And if whats likely to be an innocent mistake deters people from playing the game, then they're players that are not worth it in the first place. Chances are no companies will take someone to court over a couple of textures, its simply not worth the time or effort. Its something that, while unfortunately, game developers will have to grin and bear. quality comparison, in my own engine development ventures I've taken textures from Quake 3 to compare how they look in my engine compared to the native engine) and the person who put them in there left the company, or simply forgot to take them out.Įven if an employee DID put them in there on purpose to cut corners, does anyone have a suggestion on how a company can control this sort of thing to ensure that it doesn't happen? Its simply not possible to physically compare EVERY texture in a build to EVERY texture in EVERY other game. Why is everyone assuming that this was done purposely? Its perfectly plausible (and highly more likely) that these textures were put in there for legit reasons (i.e.
0 kommentar(er)
